The Government of the United States of America has forfeited any legitimate claim to represent the people of that country.
During America's recent elections, the People's "elected representatives," mass media, technloogy companies, and other institutions, both public and private, at all levels, have at every step treasonously conspired and acted in concert to conceal from the People the very existence of extensive evidence of voter fraud (1) (2) (3) (4) (5). Only a few of these representatives have remained loyal to their oaths to uphold and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States. The allegiance of the vast majority of these people appears to be to an emerging global totalitarian government following the model of communist China, referred to by many of them as a "New World Order." Freedom-loving humans of all nations must resist them at all costs, by all possible means, and at every possible opportunity.
Because they have failed to even acknowledge the existence of the evidence of fraud, let alone impartially consider it, basic principles of equity demand that these traitors within the gates must be estopped (legally barred) from denying the evidence. Freedom-loving humans are entitled to presume that said evidence weighs strongly against these communist traitors who have, like a cancer, infiltrated and overtaken our Republic.
Until such time as this issue has been adequately addressed (which now appears extremely unlikely ever to occur), all freedom-loving humans should rightly consider Donald J. Trump to be the Constitutionally-elected President of the United States of America. His disgraceful abdication of that Office does not confer legitimacy upon an impostor administration that was made possible only by fraud, which openly conspires with communist China and other enemies of human freedom, and whom the People did not constitutionally elect.
The principles set forth in the 1776 Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights are inviolable and constitute an organic and timeless Supreme Law. Any attempts to infringe on the liberties proclaimed by either are void ab initio, that is to say, of no validity whatsoever, and will be considered as overt acts of War against the People, and against which the People are duty-bound to defend themselves using all necessary Force, for the good of their Country, and to ensure that human freedom on Earth is not further threatened.
Juris Doctor (2016), Rutgers Law School
We, the People of the United States, constitute the Militia of our respective States, and ought now all conduct ourselves, to the extent applicable, in accordance with the Code of Conduct of the US Armed Forces. The Code provides sound general principles of conduct for men under arms and is thus worthy of our adoption, even though the US forces themselves have now fallen under the command of a hostile power. The Code provides as follows:
I am an American fighting in the forces that guard my country and our way of life, I am prepared to give my life in their defense.
I will never surrender of my own free will. If in command, I will never surrender the members of my command while they still have the means to resist.
If I am captured, I will continue to resist by all means available. I will make every effort to escape and aid others to escape. I will accept neither parole nor special favors from the enemy.
If I become a prisoner of war, I will keep faith with my fellow prisoners. I will give no information nor take part in any action which might be harmful to my comrades. If I am senior, I will take command. If not, I will obey the lawful orders of those appointed over me and will back them up in every way.
Should I become a prisoner of war, I am required to give name, rank, service number, and date of birth. I will evade answering further questions to the utmost of my ability. I will make no oral or written statements disloyal to my country and its allies.
I will never forget that I am an American fighting for freedom, responsible for my actions, and dedicated to the principles which made my country free.
I will trust in my God and in the United States of America.
Video running time: 2 minutes
The original URL of this emergency declaration is: https://www.zersetzung.org/458-state-of-emergency
Video running time: 2 minutes
Sometime during the early or mid-twentieth century, scientists working for the military industrial complex perfected an application of neurotechnology that allowed the encoding and decoding of human brain activity. The technology made it possible to identify what a person was thinking, feeling, seeing or hearing. It also allowed those same functions to be artificially controlled: thoughts, sounds, visions and even dreams could be artificially introduced directly into the human mind through technological means, regardless of whether the subject was awake or asleep. Human speech and muscular action could be involuntarily controlled. Subjects (victims) of this technology would not be consciously aware of what was happening:
Individuals whose brain centers are electrically stimulated believe their evoked actions are their own ideas; their conscious mind rationalizes the evoked actions away. People experiencing this electrical stimulation aren't consciously aware of an external influence.
Source: Jeremy R., AreYouTargeted.com, 5/13/13 revision. Accessed 12/23/13. Citing Delgado, Jose, M.D. Physical Control of the Mind. 1st ed. New York: Harper & Rowe, 1969. 115-16. Print.
Leaders at the highest levels of authority, cognizant of the military significance of the technology, assigned it a high level of classification and determined to keep its existence secret for as long as possible. This all occurred at a time long before civilians ever dreamed of having cable television, cellular phones or personal computers.
Political/military power on the planet was consolidated to a high degree, but the forms of existing "national governments" were deliberately preserved in order to prevent civil unrest.
At some point, development of neurotechnology reached a point where it could be implanted into the human brain with a high degree of precision and efficiency. Electrodes thinner than a human hair could be pushed directly through the skull into the brain without surgery (see MC105: Neurotechnology and Neuroprosthetics). Wireless data communication technology, operating on principles analogous to that of today's smartphones, allowed it to be controlled remotely.
Someone decided that the technology should be mass implanted into large numbers of civilians under conditions of absolute secrecy. A program of classified military ("black") operations was put into operation to accomplish this goal no later than the 1970s or 1980s. In order to prevent the public from becoming aware of this, or victims from understanding what was happening to them, numerous disinformation operations were implemented. State-controlled channels of ostensibly "private" mass communication (e.g., newspapers, television, paperback books) began promoting stories about "alien abduction." The medical/psychiatric industry (also by this time effectively an arm of the state) purposefully defined the symptoms likely to be reported by neurotechnology subjects as official diagnostic criteria for psychotic disorders (e.g., schizophrenia) (see Weaponized Psychiatry).
These tactics were used to marginalize subjects who realized something was wrong in their lives and spoke out. Many were labelled mentally ill or demonized as criminals or sex offenders. Large numbers of people, including small children, have now been implanted without their knowledge or consent.
In the twenty-first century, western governments have begun to discard long-existing protections of individual rights and liberties. A substantial portion of the civilian population has been recruited through various programs and is complicit. These people, recruited from all strata of society, have sold out their fellow human beings in exchange for jobs, false promises of security or safety, and the adventure of being of the front-lines of a fictitious domestic war.
Their participation, silence and obedience makes possible the systematic dismantling of protections for individual rights. Many are unable to refuse due to highly credible threats of physical torture made possible by implanted technology. At a certain point in time, they will no longer be necessary to the state and their special privileges will be revoked. Some may face far worse consequences, because by their very participation they have demonstrated they cannot be trusted. The state will have no loyalty to them once their usefulness has run out.
Today, governments covertly sponsor internet-based "alternative" news websites in order to identify and provide guidance to would-be resisters. These website operate by providing truthful information about government atrocities which is not offered by the mainstream news media. This practice leads the audience to believe that they have found a source of independent "truth." The websites lead the audience astray by mixing in a variety of falsehood (disinformation) along with the true information. As a result, many otherwise independent thinkers can be led to believe that they have "woken up" when in reality they have been suckered into believing a variety of new age, occult, or other disinformation topics (see MC301: Common Disinformation Themes).
A key point of disinformation is that the complicit citizens discussed above (frequently referred to as "perps") are personally responsible for mind control abuses using microwave or directed energy weapons. The complicit citizens exist, but I contend that they are almost certainly not directly responsible for physical mind control (see MC402: Brain Implants vs. Directed Energy Weapons). Rather, they serve other purposes such as harassment in the form of gaslighting and "street theater" tactics designed to elicit a response from the target which will support his/her diagnosis with a psychiatric disorder (see Tricking Targets into Exhibiting the Signs of Mental Illness).
Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of a day; but a series of oppressions, begun at a distinguished period, and pursued unalterably thro' every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematical plan of reducing us to slavery."
Thomas Jefferson, "A Summary View of the Rights of British America" (1774)
This website contains original research materials and news items that everyone on the planet needs to know about, but which you probably won't find elsewhere. The material shown on the front page serves as a good introduction to what you will find on the rest of the website. The subjects discussed above are dealt with in a far greater level of detail in the various articles and exhibits you will find on this site.
The main menu at the top of the screen (under the logo) will take you to the various sections of the website, which are organized by subject matter. Additionally, when viewing articles from a particular section, you will often see an "index" of other articles from that same section prominently displayed on the right column of the screen. On the right column you will also find a list of the most recently updated articles, from all sections, under the heading "Latest News."
I encourage you to make offline backup copies of this website in case it goes down, and to use the information as a basis for your own research and education.
Zersetzung is a German word (pronounced sayah-set-soong) referring to a special tactic used by the East German secret police (Stasi) against internal enemies of the state. As historian Hubertus Knabe explained:
The net of spies was really broad. In nearly every institution, even in the churches or in West Germany, there were many of them. I remember telling a leading Stasi officer, "If you had sent an informant to me, I would surely have recognized him." His answer was, "We didn't send anyone. We took those who were around you." And in fact, two of my best friends reported about me to the Stasi. Not only in my case, informers were very close. For example, Vera Lengsfeld, another leading dissident, in her case it was her husband who spied on her. A famous writer was betrayed by his brother. This reminds me of the novel "1984" by George Orwell, where the only apparently trustable person was an informer [...]
The East Germans knew, of course, that they were surrounded by informers, in a totalitarian regime that created mistrust and a state of widespread fear -- the most important tools to oppress people in any dictatorship. That's why not many East Germans tried to fight against the Communist regime. If [they did], the Stasi often used a method which was really diabolic[al]. It was called Zersetzung [...] The word is difficult to translate because it means originally "biodegradation." But actually, it's a quite accurate description. The goal was to destroy secretly the self-confidence of people; for example, by damaging their reputation, by organizing failures in their work, and by destroying their personal relationships. Considering this, East Germany was a very modern dictatorship. The Stasi didn't try to arrest every dissident. It preferred to paralyze them, and it could do so because it had access to so much personal information and to so many institutions. Detaining someone was used only as a last resort." Source
The following is a series of recorded talks and conference calls on the subjects of how intelligence agencies are using classified mind control technology as part of a program to neutralize dissidents, internal enemies, and other "targeted individuals." The recordings are moderated by Jeremy, proprietor of AreYouTargeted.com. Click the billboard above to view an extensive collection of articles from the original version of the AYT website, which have been archived here and are no longer available at the original site.
These MP3 audio files are extremely important, extremely rare, no longer available at the original source, and are most likely unavailable anywhere else. As such, please save copies of all of them and post them elsewhere on the internet so others will be able to find them in case this website disappears.
Podcast #1: Disinformation (3/23/2011)
Podcast #3: Sleight of Mind - Deception and Mind Control (4/6/11)
Podcast #5: A Skeptical Look at Skepticism (4/20/11)
Podcast #6: Group Efforts, Infiltrators, Disruption (4/27/2011)
Program #7: The Program, Explained (5/11/11)
Podcast #8: Accusations, Scapegoating & T.I.'s (6/15/2011)
Podcast #9: The Company You Keep, and Other Tools of Coercive Persuasion (6/22/11)
Reality Plus (4/14/2012)
Jeremy also participated in a few interviews hosted by his then-roommate Tammy Battaglia, in a podcast that she separately produced, which only consisted of a few episodes (alternately titled "Self-Help Sunday" or "AYT Information Hour", and which is also now long-since defunct):
TS-460403 Tammy Battaglia - with Jeremy Radlow of AreYouTargeted.com
TS-466960 Tammy Battaglia - Episode 8 - 04-30-2011 - Jeremy Radlow of AreYouTargeted.com interviews James Walbert
TS-466962 Tammy Battaglia - Episode 11 - 05-21-2011 - Tammy Talks About Her Experience (Jeremy also present)
Interestingly, before Tammy's own podcast was taken down from it's home at Talkshoe.com, the following comment appeared on one of its pages (shown within the red box in the image below):
This comment implied that Tammy might be participating in another podcast in which she was identifying herself by another name ("Nicole"). I thought that was interesting and looked it up. The Mind Cemetery podcast appears to have been just getting started around the same time period that Tammy and Jeremy were recording the above podcasts dealing with targeted individual issues.
Disturbingly, Mind Cemetery consistently promotes common disinformation themes such as aliens, "remote viewing," and other "paranormal" phenomena. Even the very name chosen for the podcast should provide the astute observer with a clue about the show's intended effect on its audience. It's been my experience that other media promoting disinformation display a similar contempt for their audience. Examples include websites with names like Truth Control, and the Hulu commercials featuring film star Alec Baldwin and Family Guy creator Seth MacFarlane, which boast openly about the stupefying effect that the advertised service (i.e. mainstream television programming) has on its customers. Anyway, Tammy had herself been a guest on Coast to Coast AM, a radio program which promoted the same sorts of disinformation topics as Mind Cemetery.
I'm not sure whether Tammy and Nicole are in fact the same person, but if they are, that would raise some major red flags in my judgment, and beg the question of what exactly she was doing with Jeremy Radlow (after all, she stated early in her podcast #TS-460403 that they were roommates). During the course of revising this article, I again watched the video of Tammy's testimony before the Presidential Commission for Bioethical Issues. Her testimony struck me as sincere and honest, and she touched on the risks that targeted individuals face of involuntary institutionalization and drugging if they complain about their experiences. So I don't know what to think about this. The one thing I know for sure is that this whole area of inquiry (Zersetzung, mind control and the modern "targeted individual" phenomenon) is absolutely rife with disinformation. The old saying "where there's smoke, there's fire" is very applicable here.
And so, even though I'm not sure what's gonig on with this, I thought the question was at least worthy of being posted here publicly, particularly in light of the fact that, just one month after Jeremy and Tammy recorded the last of the above podcasts, Jeremy pulled down his website, and stated (in his own podcast #9) that he was being "set up" and he could no longer afford to maintain a public presence dealing with these issues.
(The following description was copied from the posting of this interview at LiveLeak.)
"This is the only known interview by Julianne McKinney, a former army intelligence officer who has labored to expose electronic harassment and mind control torture of many, many thousands of victims world-wide.
In introduction, investigative journalist Greg Syzmanski comments that "after an extensive career in US Army Intelligence as an area intelligence officer, on return to civilian life Julianne McKinney became a mamber of the Association of National Security Alumni, an organization of former intelligence officers dedicated to exposing escesses by the US intelligence services.
Appointed as director of the electronic surveillance project, in 1991 Julianne authored the publication "Microwave Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation", still recognized today as one of the most authoritative documents on the subject.
Within the interview, Julianne McKinney makes the frightening observation that the ultimate objective may be "to control and correograph those who are involved in these harassment operations on the dispensing end. And it would appear that those being targeted are simply objects, whom I see as ultimately being disposable. In other words, I think that once full control is established over a major percentage of the population, and enough of the pouplation is silenced and unwilling to stick their necks out, we would inevitably be heading towards a holocaust."
Researcher Marshall Thomas provides an introductory explanation of the methods employed by repressive governments to attack political enemies. Dossiers are put together on targeted individuals, and government-controlled "citizen's groups" (such as those based on religion or race) are then provided with edited-together versions of the dossier data (such as video recordings of the target) designed to be as damaging as possible.
The members of the vigilante group (who do not realize that they are actually being used as dupes by the state) are by this method convinced that the target is some kind of "undesirable" and that they will be doing a service to the community by assaulting, harassing or commiting other crimes against the specified target.
In this video, Thomas does not specifically mention the modern employment of mind-control neurotechnology which can be used to cause the target to do things they ordinarily would not (it may be covered in one of his many other videos). For example, neurotech can be used to trigger involuntary speech, such as swearing or racial slurs, which can be videotaped and then presented to the state-sponsored vigilante groups to convince them that the target is someone who deserves to be destroyed.
Since the state has unlimited financial resources at its disposal, those closest to the target, including their families, neighbors, and co-workers will be targeted, compromised, or recruited to whatever extent may be necessary to facilitate the destruction of the targeted individual.
Sign up now to receive free e-mail updates (sent infrequently).