Question 'The Science'? Go To Gulag!

In the Soviet Union it was forbidden to dispute the wisdom of the “party line.” That’s because Marxian communism was viewed as the scientifically inevitable progression of mankind. For Marx and Lenin, the “science was settled.” Therefore anyone speaking out against “the science” of the Soviet system must be acting with malice; must actually want destruction; must want people to die.

Anyone voicing opposition to the “settled science” of Marxism-Leninism soon found their voice silenced. Oftentimes permanently.

Ironically, just 30 years after the “science” of Marxism-Leninism imploded for all the world to see, we are witnessing a resurgence here in the US of the idea that to question “the science” is not to seek truth or refine understanding of what appears to be conflicting evidence. No, it is to actually wish harm on one’s fellow Americans.

And while we who question “the science” are not being physically carried off to the gulags for disputing the wisdom of our “betters” in the CDC or the World Health Organization, for example, we are finding that the outcome is the same. We are being silenced and accused of malicious intent. The Soviet Communists called dissidents like us “wreckers.”

Last week on my daily news broadcast, the Ron Paul Liberty Report, we reported on two whistleblowers from inside the CDC and Big Pharma who raised serious and legitimate questions about the prevailing coronavirus narrative. The former Chief Science Officer for the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, Dr. Mike Yeadon, has stated that from his experience he believes that nearly 90 percent of the current tests for Covid produce false positives. That means that this massive expansion in “cases,” used to justify continued attacks on our civil liberties, is simply phony.

As Dr. Yeadon said in a recent interview about the Orwellian UK coronavirus lockdown, “we are basing a government policy, an economic policy, a civil liberties policy, in terms of limiting people to six people in a meeting...all based on, what may well be, completely fake data on this coronavirus?”

Is Dr. Yeadon correct in claiming that based on his scientific observation there is no “second wave”? We don’t know. But we do know that his claims that the massive increase in “cases” in Europe used to justify new lockdowns are not in any way being matched with a similar increase in deaths. The EU’s own charts prove this. Deaths remain a flat line near zero while “cases” skyrocket to match the massive increase in testing.

Yet when we reported on Dr. Yeadon’s findings on the Liberty Report last week we found that for the first time ever, our program was removed by YouTube.

YouTube, owned by Google, which is firmly embedded into the deep state, was vague in explaining just where we violated their “community standards” by simply reporting on qualified scientists who happen to disagree with the mainstream coronavirus narrative.

But they did offer this shocking explanation in an email sent to us at the Ron Paul Liberty Report: “YouTube does not allow content that explicitly disputes the efficacy of the World Health Organization.”

Incredible!

It’s not the science that is settled. What appears to be “settled" is the impulse to silence anyone who asks “why”?

Copyright © 2020 by RonPaul Institute. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given.

Source:  http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2020/september/28/question-the-science-go-to-gulag/
Highlighting and bold emphasis added by Zersetzung.org. The content is otherwise unedited.

Comment by Zersetzung.org editor:  YouTube (Google), like most big tech and mainstream media, is controlled by intelligence agencies.  Therefore, the censorship detailed above is state-sponsored, bringing it within the purview of, and violating, the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. For more information on this point, please see: State Action Doctrine & Intelligence Agency Dictatorship Part II

Video running time: 5 minutes

Text source: Summit.News

Top pathologist Dr. Roger Hodkinson told government officials in Alberta during a zoom conference call that the current coronavirus crisis is “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspecting public.”

Hodkinson’s comments were made during a discussion involving the Community and Public Services Committee and the clip was subsequently uploaded to YouTube.

Noting that he was also an expert in virology, Hodkinson pointed out that his role as CEO of a biotech company that manufactures COVID tests means, “I might know a little bit about all this.”

“There is utterly unfounded public hysteria driven by the media and politicians, it’s outrageous, this is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspecting public,” said Hodkinson.

The doctor said that nothing could be done to stop the spread of the virus besides protecting older more vulnerable people and that the whole situation represented “politics playing medicine, and that’s a very dangerous game.”

Hodkinson remarked that “social distancing is useless because COVID is spread by aerosols which travel 30 meters or so before landing,” as he called for society to be re-opened immediately to prevent the debilitating damage being caused by lockdowns.

Hodkinson also slammed mandatory mask mandates as completely pointless.

“Masks are utterly useless. There is no evidence base for their effectiveness whatsoever,” he said.

“Paper masks and fabric masks are simply virtue signalling. They’re not even worn effectively most of the time. It’s utterly ridiculous. Seeing these unfortunate, uneducated people – I’m not saying that in a pejorative sense – seeing these people walking around like lemmings obeying without any knowledge base to put the mask on their face.”

The doctor also slammed the unreliability of PCR tests, noting that “positive test results do not, underlined in neon, mean a clinical infection,” and that all testing should stop because the false numbers are “driving public hysteria.”

Hodkinson said that the risk of death in the province of Alberta for people under the age of 65 was “one in three hundred thousand,” and that it was simply “outrageous” to shut down society for what the doctor said “was just another bad flu.”

“I’m absolutely outraged that this has reached this level, it should all stop tomorrow,” concluded Dr. Hodkinson.

Hodkinson’s credentials are beyond question, with the MedMalDoctors website affirming his credibility.

“He received his general medical degrees from Cambridge University in the UK (M.A., M.B., B. Chir.) where he was a scholar at Corpus Christi College. Following a residency at the University of British Columbia he became a Royal College certified general pathologist (FRCPC) and also a Fellow of the College of American Pathologists (FCAP).”

“He is in good Standing with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, and has been recognized by the Court of Queen’s Bench in Alberta as an expert in pathology.”

In case the above video gets deleted by YouTube, a backup via Bitchute is available here.

Did you notice how both Trump and Biden seem to just loooove Dr. Fauci so much, even though they can't seem to agree on much else -- isn't that funny?  Trump supporters at one of his rallies a few months ago chanted "fire Fauci" repeatedly, and Trump replied that he might do so "after the election."  But Trump didn't fire Fauci.  And Biden announced he'd keep Fauci on the payroll.  Biden and Trump don't agree on much, but they agree on how great of a guy Fauci is, Kary Mullis be damned.

Anyway, to the point:

1. On December 1, 2019, Brandy Vaughan, the anti-vaccination activist who created LearnTheRisk.org, made this Facebook post stating that she had no intentions of commiting suicide and that if anything happened to her, it would surely be foul play.

2. On December 7, 2020, Brandy Vaughan died at age 45.  As expected, the C.I.A. (via the "local police" and the "private media") has assured us that it was from natural causes. 

Because lots of people die of natural causes at age 45, especially those who question vaccinations.  Totally believable. No, any viewpoint dangerous enough to the system to earn its own special label for use in ad hominem attacks by military/intelligence influence operatives (in this case the usual term of attack is "anti-vaxxer") is also a viewpoint the expression of which is likely to lead to the whacking of the expressor of such viewpoint.  Another whacking by the C.I.A., because who else would it be (a rhetorical question)?

Just like all of the other murdered and silenced dissidents mentioned on this site, like Jim Keith, Stephen Knight and others.  I write this as someone who has years of legal education and has been trained to split hairs between facts, law, opinion and argument.  In the law there's a concept called a "presumption."  Presumptions apply when a certain set of facts tend to imply something else, and the jury will be instructed to find that that something else actually in fact happened, if that certain prerequisite set of facts exists.  Well, I say that when a political dissident focused on lightning-rod subjects like vaccination  is found dead "of natural causes" at age 45, just a year after they for some reason found it necessary to post on Facebook saying they were worried about getting killed and wanted to make clear they weren't planning to commit suicide, we can safely presume they got whacked by the C.I.A., regardless of what their God-damned traitorous police and media say to the contrary.